Billionaire Larry Ellison (https://www.businessinsider.com/larry-ellison) claims vast AI-powered surveillance system could ensure ‘best citizen behaviour’
🗣 Larry Ellison claims that AI will enable the creation of a large-scale surveillance system that will be able to control citizens.
🗣 According to Larry Ellison , the billionaire co-founder of Oracle, he said AI would usher in a new era of surveillance that he gleefully said would ensure “citizens behave at their best.”
🗣 Ellison said that in the future, artificial intelligence will be used to continuously monitor and analyze extensive surveillance systems such as CCTV cameras, police body cameras, doorbell cameras and car dashboard cameras.
🗣 “We will have oversight,” Ellison said. “Every police officer will be under constant supervision, and if there is a problem, the AI will report it and pass it on to the appropriate person. Citizens will be on their best behavior because we are constantly recording and reporting everything that is happening.”
🗣 Ellison also expects AI-powered drones to replace police cars in high-speed chases. “You just have the drone follow the car,” Ellison said. “It’s very easy in the age of autonomous drones.” mRNADeathToll TG
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-04-24-everything-you-need-to-know-about-blackrock.html
The Defense Production Act of 1950 grants the President broad authority to control industries during national emergencies. Under this law, the government can direct private companies to prioritize government contracts, allocate resources, and, in certain extreme cases, seize control of company operations related to national defense. While typically invoked for defense manufacturing, it could be stretched to include matters like election security if national security is threatened.
Relevant sections: The President may “allocate materials, services, and facilities” to promote national defense, and even seize facilities deemed essential to national security under severe conditions.
The Insurrection Act of 1807 allows the President to deploy military forces within the United States to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion. While this act is traditionally used for maintaining public order, it could, in theory, be invoked if a company were directly threatening the functioning of government, such as by attempting to destabilize an election. The government could argue that actions interfering with elections represent a threat to public order or governance, justifying federal intervention in company operations.
The National Emergencies Act of 1976 allows the President to declare a national emergency, under which a wide range of emergency powers become available. This includes powers from other statutes, like the DPA, or even military powers, if the emergency directly affects national security. For example, if a company’s actions are viewed as an existential threat to the democratic process or national security, the President could use emergency powers to temporarily seize the company’s operations. A national emergency could be declared if a private company’s interference with elections was severe enough to undermine national stability.
In times of declared war or military conflict, the President is granted additional powers under the War Powers Resolution. Though this is typically used for deploying military forces abroad, in a highly unusual circumstance, the President could argue that controlling a domestic company is necessary for national defense.
Martial law involves the military taking direct control over civilian government functions in extreme cases of insurrection, invasion, or complete breakdown of civil order. While martial law has rarely been declared in U.S. history, it could theoretically include taking control of key private industries, such as a company involved in destabilizing the electoral process. This would be an extreme and controversial move, as martial law typically involves the suspension of ordinary legal processes.
Historical Examples
Truman’s Seizure of Steel Mills (1952): During the Korean War, President Truman attempted to seize steel mills to prevent a strike from disrupting war production, citing national defense. The Supreme Court struck this down in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, ruling that the President did not have the inherent power to seize private property without congressional authorization.
Our ministry is supported by people like you. Partner with us to save souls as we relate current events/news to the Word of God and the Gospel!
Subscribe to SJWellFire: Final Days Report to follow Scott’s latest reports.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.